'ON PERHAPS WHY THERE CAN BE NO LEARNING IN TELEVISION LEARNING'
Last week, I went through the second advertisement of Airtel
DTH’s latest campaign. A teen we’ve all seen with a familiar detestation and
escapist attitude for studies, suddenly has a change of heart and takes an
interest in learning after his family switches to Airtel DTH owing to its ‘iExam
Interactive learning’ service. ’Sirf Cable Nahin, Life Badlo’ they proudly
declare. It got me pondering over the concept of Television Learning. Interactive learning content on TV to teach or assist in
teaching students.
Some research here and there later on the various education or
learning services offered by the current DTH or digital television operators in the market today reveal that majority of them provide only online testing facilities for various
topics and subjects, an example of which the aforementioned iExam services are.
There is no instruction on any subject or topic. Nothing is being ‘taught’ and
consequently nothing is being learnt. Thrown in with these testing services, is
learning content for toddlers and English Speaking courses for people.
As a viewer of the ad, when I see the ad, the first thought that
comes to my mind is something being taught on television, a perception I will
share with many. A common presumption of television Learning would involve some form of teaching done using
recorded videos and other multimedia content enabling my kin to grasp faster
and keep him engrossed with the so called interactive content. Such content is
available in the market sold by the school stationary veteran ‘Sundaram’ and
some other brands. Then why is there no such content on Television?
I think of reasons for the absence of instructional content
despite the availability of so many start-ups in the country today churning out
learning and educational content and a few observations come to mind.
Beta! 'Marks ka Sawaal hai!'
Also our school studies are parent dominated. Parents invest
a lot of time and effort in making sure that their son or daughter takes up his
studies seriously owing to the growing competition in our country.
In such a culture, parents would rather have their
son/daughter studying from books or class notes which will help them score
marks in the exam. In all probability, they have also probably paid for classes
or tuitions. They’d rather have their child do homework sums or assignments
than sit in front of the TV, unless it provides assured results against the
conventional studying from books. When operators are well aware of this culture,
why should they invest so much money developing this instructional content?
Add to this the number of Examination Boards (CBSE , ICSE
et. al) and the investment required has just shot up to create content for
diverse boards.
Perhaps the case where television learning will have the most success is the KG belt where seldom there is any syllabus and learning is as much as your child can observe and grasp. It is also a time where parents in general take a lot of interest in the exact content a toddler is studying rather than in the later years when parents are only involved in policing. This provides an ideal setup to spend time with ones son or daughter and teach him good things using the interactive content on their television. In reality too, this is where the maximum use of these interactive services is being made and copious amounts of content is available for this category.
Secondly, in India television is the only source of
entertainment amongst majority of its population. Women by far are the biggest
consumers of television. TV serial timings are treated as respectfully as Pooja
timings and efforts are made to not miss episodes and watch parallel programs
in repeat telecasts. The newer trend catching up is watching missed episodes on
Youtube. Children launch their own struggle to gain control of the television
and watch their programs. In such a crowded schedule, you cannot expect our
average family to compromise their TV time for somebody to learn - Books are
many, there is only one TV.
Chal channel change kar, Serial aa rha hai mera
Of course studying is more important and one can always
decide a fixed time to study on television daily. But our mentality will most
definitely bypass these as the TV is not supposed to be a primary mode of learning
but rather the books are. Parents would happily instead buy their kids CDs
which they can use on their desktops and shiny new laptops and save Mumma her
serial time.
Trust
Maybe at this point, using interactive television learning as a
gimmick to make the consumer ‘only believe’ that he is indeed, accessing the
next generation of television seems a better option. It is sound business sense rather than
investing in actual content which is both expensive and functionally useless.
Tests make perfect placeholders for this. What’s better, for those who actually
wish to use the testing services, the companies can happily charge them. Comparatively, the time to set up a testing service from readily available content in the market is negligible.
So if you’re a consumer looking to buy a new DTH connection
it is probably best to not even bring the TV learning into consideration while
selecting a service or plan. Most probably you’ll not end up using it anyway.
Be smart and choose an option which provides better benefits.
If you’re a DTH operator, rather a DTH operator advertising
the TV learning on national media, it might perhaps be better to find other
alternatives in digital interactive content to differentiate your brand in this
increasingly competitive market. This can be anything like simple how to videos
or as simple an application as ‘M-indicator’ which is a huge convenience for
travelling in Mumbai. Of course, all these services can easily be accessed on
the internet. But more people, especially housewives, know to use their
television remotes than their computers.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteA well written post! Something I have been thinking of as a big planning and a marketing failure is just highlighted here. :D
ReplyDeleteInsightful!
ReplyDeleteI see your point - its a marketing gimmick and i believe somehow everyone with a 12+ education knows this ...
I think it is an outcome of improper strategy design -
not creating value for all stakeholders ... this learning scheme - helps the operators (supplier)and parents (consumer) but not the kids (user)- adds pressure, while your suggestion of M-indicators - simply brilliant - adds value to all operator, consumer and the traffic/ transportation system.
I enjoyed reading it - keep writing!